Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
答:中国人民志愿军！
我很喜欢这部电影，从开始到结尾，都喜欢！一直都想找时间看看《长津湖》，但总因为三个小时的时长而犹豫，总害怕这样长的主旋律电影会充满了拖沓、说教和过度煽情，然而都没有。影片从一开头就吸引着我，探亲的战士抱着哥哥的骨灰盒行舟湖上，顽皮的少年在岸边投石撒欢，好一副充满生活和趣味的画面。整部电影虽然长，但却并不拖沓，节奏紧凑，张弛有度，三个小时看下来竟然意犹未尽。影片着重描述了两场战役：半山民宅和打北极熊团，此外穿插着一些行军的艰难和战士间的嬉戏，让观众的神经不至于全程紧绷。没有特意去煽情，仅仅通过一些真实特写就让人动容，比如啃冻土豆，比如冰雕连。篇幅有限，最后，跟着字幕默念：伟大的中国人民志愿军烈士永垂不朽！
谈谈几点电影的不足。
国产战争片巅峰，突突突突突突突突，缺点就是，长得有点过火。
一般般，没预期的好，两场打斗都有些过于冗长，看着累，毛、彭、麦等人的出场都突兀，不如剪了，只要有宋将军和史密斯师长出镜就行了
跟某人一起看的第一部电影💌
节奏紧凑，三小时下来不觉累。
首先这片是有缺点的，还不少。比如：1、节奏和篇幅的问题，前面铺垫的过长，导致后面的战争场面显得局促，而铺垫部分本身也塞了太多内容导致每一场都急匆匆；2、人物还是很脸谱化，不光是几个主角，包括美方的几个主要角色，都非常脸谱化，有一种看老电影里美帝反派的感觉；3、几个演员的表演不同程度的过火，包括最受好评的胡军和差评最多的易烊千玺；4、特效实在太对不住预算，两毛五都不值；5、很多评论里提到的配乐过多、过满非常明显。但仍不失为一部好的战争题材片，尽管拍摄的目的是多样化的、尽管逃不脱主旋律的局限，也许长津湖战役在历史上还有争论，但那场战役应该有一部电影来讲述它。。也许现在这么说听起来很粉红，但71年前如果我们没有跨过鸭绿江，没有先烈们的前仆后继，也许历史会完全不一样。我想它是值得铭记的。
演技一般。剧本略差。山舞银蛇，原驰蜡象很好，也敬佩“英雄”，但还是要再多雕琢一下才能对得起这个题材。
镜头太太太晃了，第一次和美军的正面交锋拍的比最后总攻要好很多，总觉得结局有点仓促和拉胯，韩东君和朱亚文的人设实在是太好了，一个有勇有谋神枪手，一个带着书生文雅气儿，冷静思考以小换大的指导员，其他的正常发挥吧
林超贤对战争的把控很到位啊，还是挺不错的可以看看。
而且这两天也看了些评价，因此完全没啥期待，所以整体感觉还挺不错，三个小时竟然不觉得长，基本没啥尿点。不过中间的村庄遭遇战比后面的主战场好太多了。
主旋律的电影始终是符合一些期待的。在这个时候，是正确的。
朝鲜战争长津湖战役的故事。叙事很拖沓/冗余而且越往后观感越乏力、角色塑造扁平无趣、很多（大场面）CG做得太假像游戏画面。不过各种爆炸的效果做的还挺带感，一些风景空镜头拍的也还不错还算美（尽管被垃圾特效拖累）。
电影就不评价了，谢谢先辈们给我们带来了现在的生活！
我很喜欢这部电影，从开始到结尾，都喜欢！一直都想找时间看看《长津湖》，但总因为三个小时的时长而犹豫，总害怕这样长的主旋律电影会充满了拖沓、说教和过度煽情，然而都没有。影片从一开头就吸引着我，探亲的战士抱着哥哥的骨灰盒行舟湖上，顽皮的少年在岸边投石撒欢，好一副充满生活和趣味的画面。整部电影虽然长，但却并不拖沓，节奏紧凑，张弛有度，三个小时看下来竟然意犹未尽。影片着重描述了两场战役：半山民宅和打北极熊团，此外穿插着一些行军的艰难和战士间的嬉戏，让观众的神经不至于全程紧绷。没有特意去煽情，仅仅通过一些真实特写就让人动容，比如啃冻土豆，比如冰雕连。篇幅有限，最后，跟着字幕默念：伟大的中国人民志愿军烈士永垂不朽！
林超贤 徐克 陈凯歌三剑客搭配不错
看完确实爱国热情高涨，太过惨烈，发展强大才是硬道理啊
准备好的纸巾攥在手里没用到 剧情有些虎头蛇尾
“希望下一代 能够活在一个没有硝烟的年代”，如今繁华盛世，如你所愿❤️。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
