剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 九阳曦 5小时前 :

    想象过很多次她的婚礼,对方不是我

  • 优锦 3小时前 :

    不说电影拍的多好,至少画面比较唯美,唤起很多回忆,女校的回忆…

  • 在永思 8小时前 :

    20220512深圳PT下载电脑断断续续观看。“没被男人碰过而已,碰过就回不了头了”,事情实却没那么简单。导演节奏把控一般,没有一气呵成的畅爽。

  • 千竹月 9小时前 :

    같은 애아빠로서 너무 짜증나는 순간이다, 나도 이러한 일을 당했지만 너는 내가 지킨다. 괴롭힘은 범죄다. 기분이 좋지 않지만 영화는 명작이다.

  • 德树 2小时前 :

    要素挺多的,疯批、蓝宇、伴娘,虽然有点高开低走,拼个7.2还是没问题的 (短发女生有点太直女了吼,有点生硬呐

  • 彬敏 3小时前 :

    韩国现在校园暴力问题很火,本片精彩的在后面,一步一步交代绝不在前面露出一点线索,确实,比起那三个施暴的孩子,律师的孩子更坏,人性的劣根性最后表现无疑,孩子像爸爸。

  • 伍春华 3小时前 :

    看完是真让我不知如何描述了 这对建宇母亲公平吗 反而真相显的那么无力 果然父母都是自私的

  • 廉又蓝 7小时前 :

    【21.12.3,万达,7.5-7.8 out of 10】非常合格的商业电影,有瑕疵,但是瑕不掩瑜的作品。因为时间篇幅的限制,肯定不得不作大幅度的删减。电影上保留了许愿一家三代人为了保护中国的文物默默牺牲和奉献的主干,电影里对于中国的文物,围棋,法身佛和报身佛基本佛教知识都有涉猎,要让观众在120分钟内强行理解很多文史知识,确实是比较冒险的尝试。许愿和药不然的三次比试谁我很喜欢的部分,尤其第二部分在魁市的拍的尤为好看。阿如拿饰演的反派角色这次得到了一致好评,他演的很不错,但是在电影里我觉得喧宾夺主了。李现的药不然的戏份被删减太多了,所以药不然和药来的故事线没能很好的展开太可惜了,书里我还是很喜欢这两个人物的。非常期待继续有第2部,在2021年看过的电影里这部是我比较满意的商业电影,为了平衡

  • 买凝珍 3小时前 :

    最后影片呈现为一种大义凛然的主旋律叙事,一家人接连用名誉和生命保护了国宝的安全。

  • 寒娟秀 8小时前 :

    年终适合带家里人一起嗨嗨皮皮进电影院的片子。。。

  • 崇初兰 6小时前 :

    啊这,短发演技我惊呆了

  • 少巧云 8小时前 :

    先声明我是李现颜粉,但是腮帮子和台词拿捏真的太太太出戏了!雷佳音感觉和长安十二时辰、刺杀小说家没什么区别,老爱演这种吊儿郎当不得志的套路角色。许家爷爷最后送的还是真佛头,汉奸罪名永远洗不掉哈。

  • 优香 6小时前 :

    虽说逻辑上不是很严谨的犯罪片,但是却反映了很真实的人性,最后的反转再反转,让人再次看见人性的恶

  • 彩惠 8小时前 :

    理解不了这滤镜,有些戏也感觉多余了,其实是为了看谈善言,三星算是对速龙的鼓励吧

  • 平宏阔 7小时前 :

    2.5星,比较小清新的电影了,片中亲吻的镜头很唯美,但是导演一些故事处理的不清楚,镜头故事线模糊,很多片段看起来都令人头大!说不尊重新郎的人......其实gay片里也不尊重女生啊....甚至还骗女生生孩子呢……两位主演都挺好看的,短发女生的眼睛真的好看!🛏️戏那里眼睛太好看了!突然发现导演是个女生....不会???🤔

  • 丛蕴美 6小时前 :

    观影感受:过瘾!全员演技在线自然不露痕,台词听得我太舒服了。整个故事线清晰节奏紧凑特效逼真,伏笔埋得好(可能要归功于原著不过我还没看过……)"局中局"体现得淋漓尽致,演员也好多熟面孔,葛大爷太让人惊喜!结尾的升华也很好,真的是今年非常不错的一部片子!值得电影院观看,两个小时都很专注

  • 昔以晴 7小时前 :

    比较乏味,最后一看那架势就是要强行反转,果不其然,呵呵

  • 卫晟然 9小时前 :

    调色小清新 就当清纯恋爱片看看

  • 关秋莲 8小时前 :

    还是很不错的 可以打8分以上 真正的真相除了受害者施害者谁又知道呢

  • 佛元冬 0小时前 :

    刻骨铭心的BE,雨中的篮球场真是美丽又心碎。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved